Visit Gilbert Watch to view the first of a series of videos that answer questions about Russell's campaign and critical issues facing Arizona.
S.H.I.E.L.D.
Super Heroes Intent on Exposing Leftist Democrats
Saturday, June 2, 2012
Friday, June 1, 2012
Jeff Flake's Out Of State Donors
Is it odd that Jeff Flake has received almost half of his funding from donors outside of Arizona?
We think it is.
Here are the donors who are actually FROM the state he would presumably represent.
Some of whom include:
Kirk Adams $500.00
Joseph Abate $250.00
Wendy and Mark Briggs $2000
Jim and Vicki Click $10,000
Chad Coons $1000
Kevin Demenna $2500
Ross Farnsworth $7800
Broc Hiatt $2500
Don and Marie Isaacson $1000
David and Nancy LeSeuer $5000
Marion Magruder $1000
Heather Sandstrom $1000
Kenneth P Smith $250
Steve Twist $2500
Jeffrey and Holly Whiteman $5000
Bob Worsley $4600
Doug Yonko $1000
Chris Zaharis $2500
Wait.
Is this Kirk Adams' or Jerry Lewis' donor list?
No. It's Flake's. But it sure looks vaguely similar.
We think it is.
Here are the donors who are actually FROM the state he would presumably represent.
Some of whom include:
Kirk Adams $500.00
Joseph Abate $250.00

Wendy and Mark Briggs $2000
Jim and Vicki Click $10,000
Chad Coons $1000
Kevin Demenna $2500
Ross Farnsworth $7800
Broc Hiatt $2500
Don and Marie Isaacson $1000
David and Nancy LeSeuer $5000
Marion Magruder $1000
Heather Sandstrom $1000
Kenneth P Smith $250

Steve Twist $2500
Jeffrey and Holly Whiteman $5000
Bob Worsley $4600
Doug Yonko $1000
Chris Zaharis $2500
Wait.
Is this Kirk Adams' or Jerry Lewis' donor list?
No. It's Flake's. But it sure looks vaguely similar.
Labels:
Jeff Flake,
Jerry Lewis,
Kirk Adams,
lobbyist,
Worsley
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Worsley Is Getting Canvassing Help From Leftist Agitator, Randy Parraz!
Mesa Office Update: Thank you all who have come in to make calls. We will continue to make calls tonight, tomorrow and Saturday (May 23rd, 24th and 26th). Our office hours our (sic) Mon.-Thurs. 5:00PM-8:00PM and Saturday from 9:30AM-1:00PM. This Saturday we need your help to talk to independent voters about the upcoming race for Senate involving Pearce and Worsley. Please join us! 628 N Center Street, Mesa.
Jerry Lewis and his wife with Carmen Guerrero, a member of Parraz's CBA who helped Lewis during the recall election. Her comment under the picture was
"We all look fabulous when we work together."
You can see how well they work together here.
And here --------------->
And here --------------->
Between getting help from radical leftists and a few Republican tools as well as speaking with groups who are affiliated with radical leftists, (like IAF affiliate, the Mesa Education Association), it appears that Worsley is following Randy. Parraz's Jerry Lewis' playbook rather nicely.
(Lewis hugging Todd Landfried on election night)
We can't wait to see what the campaign finance report reveals.
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
More On Steve Chucri, In Case You Didn't Get The Memo Before
We vetted Steve Chucri before.
Steve Chucri is running for one of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisor positions, along with Randy Parraz's wife, Lilia Alvarez. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out which way the Board would lean should they both win the election.
We've learned by now that the Board of Supervisors meetings is where Randy Parraz and his ilk like to go and stage their feigned anger protests against people like Russell Pearce or Joe Arpaio. You know, because they create and enforce laws that crack down on illegals.
Like this time.
And this time.
And this time.
And who can forget one of the FIRST times?
( Don Stapley caught at the Parraz Election night party at the Wright House in Mesa either before or after he showed up at Lewis' party.)
Did we mention that while Chucri was the President of the Arizona Restaurant Association, the ARA PAC donated to Jeff Flake's brother in law, Kevin Gibbons, when he attempted to run against Russell Pearce in 2008?
And that he is on the board of the Arizona Tourism Alliance who came out with an official statement on SB1070:
The Tourism Industry is deeply concerned about the repercussions that will result from the debate around Senate Bill 1070. Arizona tourism is currently in a very fragile state of recovery and the negative perceptions surrounding this legislation are tarnishing Arizona’s image and could easily have a devastating effect on visitation to our state.
The Tourism Industry was not part of the development of this legislation, but unfortunately is certain to experience the unintended consequences of the economic backlash. As we’ve seen many times in recent years, tourism is being used as leverage for a political issue with no direct connection to our industry.
Instead of driving our state’s economy even further into decline and punishing the 200,000 families who rely on tourism for their livelihoods, we proudly ask all Arizonans’ to support the diverse and global workforce that comprises the Tourism Industry and to invite friends, family, associations and businesses to visit and experience Arizona firsthand.
Chucri then went on record as having said this about SB1070:
And this:
(What about if our own state Senator, Raul Grijalva, hadn't called for a BOYCOTT on HIS OWN STATE? Where was his outrage over Grijalva's instigations and potential damage to the industries he represented?)
It also sounds like Mr. Chucri is still dwelling on the lawsuit he filed as President of the Arizona Restaurant Association against the State of Arizona over E-Verify in 2008. Which is funny because just recently, Chucri said of Don Stapley, who is embroiled in legal troubles of his own,
Shortly after E-Verify passed, Chucri alluded that the law created an increase in race-based attacks:
Adding it all up, it's pretty clear that Chucri isn't too fond of E-Verify and it's not looking like he's a big fan of SB1070 either. Again, how will he be able to stand up to the pressure that awaits him should he win the election? Will he agree to the leftist propaganda if they parade the "Arizona Accord" in front of the board? Will he pacify the Parraz group? The DREAM activists? Will he vote to deny funding for our Sheriff that is intended to go towards illegal immigration enforcement as was already done by the board?
Chucri said,
Is Washington the sole authority on how we can protect our citizens from those who choose to enter our country illegally? That sounds like the same argument that the leftist "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" crowd takes. Which sounds an awful lot like the shameless argument the DOJ used in front of the Supreme Court over the constitutionality of portions of SB1070. It's WASHINGTON'S fault! States don't have the authority to enforce immigration law!
We'll, we'll just have to see about that next month when the Supreme Court rules in favor of Arizona and SB1070.
Steve Chucri is running for one of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisor positions, along with Randy Parraz's wife, Lilia Alvarez. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out which way the Board would lean should they both win the election.
We've learned by now that the Board of Supervisors meetings is where Randy Parraz and his ilk like to go and stage their feigned anger protests against people like Russell Pearce or Joe Arpaio. You know, because they create and enforce laws that crack down on illegals.
Like this time.
And this time.
And this time.
And who can forget one of the FIRST times?
( Don Stapley caught at the Parraz Election night party at the Wright House in Mesa either before or after he showed up at Lewis' party.)Did we mention that while Chucri was the President of the Arizona Restaurant Association, the ARA PAC donated to Jeff Flake's brother in law, Kevin Gibbons, when he attempted to run against Russell Pearce in 2008?
And that he is on the board of the Arizona Tourism Alliance who came out with an official statement on SB1070:
The Tourism Industry is deeply concerned about the repercussions that will result from the debate around Senate Bill 1070. Arizona tourism is currently in a very fragile state of recovery and the negative perceptions surrounding this legislation are tarnishing Arizona’s image and could easily have a devastating effect on visitation to our state.
The Tourism Industry was not part of the development of this legislation, but unfortunately is certain to experience the unintended consequences of the economic backlash. As we’ve seen many times in recent years, tourism is being used as leverage for a political issue with no direct connection to our industry.
Instead of driving our state’s economy even further into decline and punishing the 200,000 families who rely on tourism for their livelihoods, we proudly ask all Arizonans’ to support the diverse and global workforce that comprises the Tourism Industry and to invite friends, family, associations and businesses to visit and experience Arizona firsthand.
Chucri then went on record as having said this about SB1070:
"The Arizona Restaurant Association says business was better than expected in 2010 -- up more than $80 million over the previous year. But, President Steve Chucri wondered if it could have been better without 1070."
And this:
"Similar fears are being expressed in the restaurant industry. Steve Chucri, president of the Arizona Restaurant Association, said some local restaurants are already feeling the affect of the new law.
"I can tell you I know that there have been cancellations of conferences," he said, adding that that has an indirect impact to local restaurants.
Even though those who work in the restaurants are likely to be legal immigrants, Chucri said "there's always been a sense of uneasiness since 2007," when the state passed a law that cracks down on employers who hire undocumented immigrants.
"To take one's business license is serious action. When you saw that in 2007, so many things happened. There is one thing clear: there is a need for immigration reform in the nation," Chucri said. "When is Washington going to wake up and answer the call?"
(What about if our own state Senator, Raul Grijalva, hadn't called for a BOYCOTT on HIS OWN STATE? Where was his outrage over Grijalva's instigations and potential damage to the industries he represented?)
It also sounds like Mr. Chucri is still dwelling on the lawsuit he filed as President of the Arizona Restaurant Association against the State of Arizona over E-Verify in 2008. Which is funny because just recently, Chucri said of Don Stapley, who is embroiled in legal troubles of his own,
"It's hard to ask for someone's vote, all the while suing them. I think there's a fundamental disconnect."
Exactly how much of our tax dollars were spent defending the lawsuit Chucri filed against the state? And now he's asking for us to vote for him too?
Exactly how much of our tax dollars were spent defending the lawsuit Chucri filed against the state? And now he's asking for us to vote for him too?
Shortly after E-Verify passed, Chucri alluded that the law created an increase in race-based attacks:
But other restaurant owners also have seen an increase in race-based attacks, said Steve Chucri, president and chief executive of the Arizona Restaurant and Hospitality Association, one of several business groups suing to block the employer sanctions law from taking effect on the grounds that the law is unconstitutional.
Adding it all up, it's pretty clear that Chucri isn't too fond of E-Verify and it's not looking like he's a big fan of SB1070 either. Again, how will he be able to stand up to the pressure that awaits him should he win the election? Will he agree to the leftist propaganda if they parade the "Arizona Accord" in front of the board? Will he pacify the Parraz group? The DREAM activists? Will he vote to deny funding for our Sheriff that is intended to go towards illegal immigration enforcement as was already done by the board?Chucri said,
"When is Washington going to wake up and answer the call?"
Is Washington the sole authority on how we can protect our citizens from those who choose to enter our country illegally? That sounds like the same argument that the leftist "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" crowd takes. Which sounds an awful lot like the shameless argument the DOJ used in front of the Supreme Court over the constitutionality of portions of SB1070. It's WASHINGTON'S fault! States don't have the authority to enforce immigration law!
We'll, we'll just have to see about that next month when the Supreme Court rules in favor of Arizona and SB1070.
Labels:
Don Stapley,
lilia alvarez,
mary rose wilcox,
SB1070,
steve chucri
Sunday, May 27, 2012
Memorial Day
"These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country, but he that stands it NOW deserves the love and thanks of man and woman."
-Thomas Paine
Spirit, that made those heroes dare
To die, and leave their children free,
Bid Time and Nature gently spare
The shaft we raise to them and thee.
To die, and leave their children free,
Bid Time and Nature gently spare
The shaft we raise to them and thee.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Friday, May 25, 2012
Why Rep. Jones "Struggled Mightily" About SB1070
Arizona Representative, Russ Jones, stood to explain his "yes" vote for SB1070. He clearly was conflicted about voting in support of the bill. Let's look at his explanation as to WHY he struggled mightily to do so.
"As you know, Mr. Speaker, I have struggled mightily with this bill. The district I come from along the AZ-Mexico border...it's not broken. That district along the border has the highest REDUCTION in illegal immigration along the entire US-Mexico border. That's because our local law enforcement and ICE work well together, hand in hand, effectively...I still have problems with this bill...Frankly, my community is NOT a sanctuary city. I can't think of one community in the State that is truly a sanctuary city. It's unfortunate we are using that term...I don't see this as a problem and wonder what it is we're fixing."
Let's break it down:
Smugglers and immigrants link up in San Luis Rio Colorado
(2006)
Study: Illegal immigration costing border counties millions
Illegal immigrants: SB-1070 will not stop us
(May 2010)
Mexican Children crossing border in San Luis, AZ to attend US SCHOOLS
(2010)
Unfinished drug tunnel found in San Luis Rio Colorado
(Feb 2011)
San Luis CBP Officers Seize Ammunition
(Feb 2012)
The fact of the matter is, the 287(g) program is only set up to crack down on those who are arrested after committing a secondary crime and does not do anything to curtail those who are committing the primary crime of entering our country illegally.
Sanctuary Cities
Arizona
Illegal Immigration Costs U.S. $113 Billion a Year, Study Finds
Illegal Immigration Costs Arizona Taxpayers $1.3 Billion Annually
(Arizonans fork out nearly $1.3 billion annually to pay for all of the costs incurred from illegal immigration; around $810 million for education, $400 million for health care related expenses, $80 million in incarceration costs, and the remainder in welfare benefits.)
http://www.immigrationcounters.com/
I think we can see why Rep. Jones "struggled mightily" to vote for SB1070.
Here.
Here.
Here.
Let's break it down:
"The district I come from along the AZ-Mexico border...
it's not broken"
Smugglers and immigrants link up in San Luis Rio Colorado
(2006)
Study: Illegal immigration costing border counties millions
Cost to Yuma may total $49.2 million since 1999
(March 2008)Illegal immigrants: SB-1070 will not stop us
(May 2010)
Mexican Children crossing border in San Luis, AZ to attend US SCHOOLS
(2010)
Unfinished drug tunnel found in San Luis Rio Colorado
(Feb 2011)
San Luis CBP Officers Seize Ammunition
(Feb 2012)
"our local law enforcement and ICE work well together, hand in hand, effectively"
The 287(g) program is an agreement between the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security and state and local law enforcement which allows local law enforcement to receive delegated authority for immigration enforcement within their jurisdictions. "The cross-designation between ICE and state and local patrol officers, detectives, investigators and correctional officers allows these local and state officers necessary resources and latitude to pursue investigations relating to violent crimes, human smuggling, gang/organized crime activity, sexual-related offenses, narcotics smuggling and money laundering."
While it may be true that the local law enforcement and ICE in Mr. Jones' district worked effectively together prior to SB1070 (although the above links paint a different picture than that of a district that wasn't "broken"), it is known that President Obama has since begun to shut the 287(g) program down.
The fact of the matter is, the 287(g) program is only set up to crack down on those who are arrested after committing a secondary crime and does not do anything to curtail those who are committing the primary crime of entering our country illegally.
"Frankly, my community is NOT a sanctuary city. I can't think of one community in the State that is truly a sanctuary city. It's unfortunate we are using that term..."
Sanctuary Cities
Arizona
- Chandler, AZ (Added 5/30/07, Congressional Research Service Report, 2006 )
- Mesa, AZ (Added 10-18-09, Sources: Judicial Watch; East Valley Tribune article,1-4-2008)
- Phoenix, AZ
- Tucson, AZ (Added 11-12-07, Source: 11-11-07 story by Brady McCombs, Arizona Daily Star.)
" don't see this as a problem and wonder what it is we're fixing."
Illegal Immigration Costs U.S. $113 Billion a Year, Study Finds
Illegal Immigration Costs Arizona Taxpayers $1.3 Billion Annually
(Arizonans fork out nearly $1.3 billion annually to pay for all of the costs incurred from illegal immigration; around $810 million for education, $400 million for health care related expenses, $80 million in incarceration costs, and the remainder in welfare benefits.)
http://www.immigrationcounters.com/
I think we can see why Rep. Jones "struggled mightily" to vote for SB1070.
Here.
Here.
Here.
Labels:
immigration,
russ jones,
SB1070
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













